It IS an endorsement of Romney, practically. Hardly another candidate is focused upon.
I was disappointed in the Times for this article.
“It IS an endorsement of Romney, practically. Hardly another candidate is focused upon.”
Not exactly an enthusiastic endorsement tho, was it? Unfortunately, we’re coming to the point where we have to start being pragmatic and stop being idealistic. Some of us may have to vote for a candidate we don’t prefer, just to stop a candidate we abhor from winning.
Double unfortunate, because Romney has really, really tumbled in my estimation recently and I had originally been very impressed by him. I’m not convinced he’s much better than Rudy, but at least he says the right things. The problem is what he says doesn’t match his past actions - perhaps even more dramatically than Rudy.
I won’t deny that I fear, no matter who the Republican nominee is, winning in November may be next to impossible simply because the candidates who should be in the lead are running last, and the weakest candidates are ahead.