Replies

Considering that the President of the United states would then be Hillary or Barack Hussein Obama, that's like saying "No, darn it, we're not going to make them take the field goal, we're going to seel them the stadium for a dolar and leave before halftime."

I played football from the time I was 5 and on into college. I've been following politics closely for about 25 years. And yet I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm telling you that neither Huckabee nor Giuliani can attract the votes to win against the dempcrat nominee. That's my opinion.

As for Rudy, I wouldn't vote for him for dogcatcher which allows me to look in the mirror in the morning and not see a hypocritical ahole.

What I meant by the football analogy is that as bad as Rudy is, having Hillary or Obama is the White House is the road to utter disaster. We will have a traitor in the Oval Office in a time of war, and that person will get to appoint two Supreme Court justices in his or her first term.

I hope to God that we don't have to consider Rudy vs. Hillary, but if we do we're talking about a candidate that is much less than he should be vs. a candidate who is bad in every single way. To me that choice is a no-brainer. It is not principled to put the Republic in her hands.