Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VU4G10

We spent years under Bush fighting off Bush/McCain/Kennedy style amnesty and now we are going to nominate some guy who characterizes opposing tuition breaks for illegals as grinding “your heel into the face of a 6-year-old child”?

I think I prefer the overweening arrogance of the open borders crowd that was just calling us racists for opposing secure borders. Huckabee has raised the stakes to calling us child abusers.

How any conservative can vote for a guy who pushes tax increases and trashes those who stand up against giveaways to illegal aliens is beyond me. Maybe Huck thinks the children of others who break the law ought to be given special privileges. How about tuition breaks for the children of bank robbers or burglars?


10 posted on 11/30/2007 5:05:46 AM PST by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Da Mav
I’ll tell you why he is leading now, because as usual conservatives has spent months and months tearing down our candidates and demanding our nominee be an life-long avid pro-life activist.

Any candidate promising judges, promising an administration not hostile to pro-life causes, hiring pro-life activists to their campaigns, or any candidate saying they were wrong in their past, or working for pro-abortion law firms, or not being for a pro-life const amendment, not Christian enough....on and on. All these candidates were/are suspicious or rabid baby killers.

So much so that threats of a 3rd party, and staying home were made, and those threats continue today.

So, here we are, as usual, without the perfect and pure candidate.

19 posted on 11/30/2007 5:19:46 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson