To: ReignOfError
Unfaithful to his wives, unfaithful to his family, unfaithful to his constituents, unfaithful to his office, unfaithful to the taxpayers, unfaithful to the constitution, unfaithful to you and me. No thanks.
13 posted on
11/29/2007 2:31:16 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Jim Robinson
Unfaithful to his wives, unfaithful to his family, unfaithful to his constituents, unfaithful to his office, unfaithful to the taxpayers, unfaithful to the constitution, unfaithful to you and me. No thanks.I'm not endorsing the creep. Just pointing out that this is a weak argument. It's like complaining that someone is eating your french fries while he's stealing your car.
To: Jim Robinson
“Unfaithful to his wives, unfaithful to his family, unfaithful to his constituents, unfaithful to his office, unfaithful to the taxpayers, unfaithful to the constitution, unfaithful to you and me. No thanks.”
Can’t find one flaw in that argument.
32 posted on
11/29/2007 3:58:22 PM PST by
toddlintown
(Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: Jim Robinson
Unfaithful to his wives, unfaithful to his family, unfaithful to his constituents, unfaithful to his office, unfaithful to the taxpayers, unfaithful to the constitution, unfaithful to you and me. No thanks.Lying and cheating get easier with practice and he's had plenty of practice. Do people really think he saves his dishonesty only for his personal life? I admire how he handled NYC after 911, but this is a man with character issues.
37 posted on
11/29/2007 4:20:38 PM PST by
McLynnan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson