Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
The scheme is this: if an officer wants to search your car, he’ll ask if you object. If you say yes, he then takes that as ‘reasonable suspicion.’ This is where they have routinely overstepped their bounds and this practice has become acceptable.

My understanding is that the Supreme Court has decided that refusal to allow a search does not by itself constitute "reasonable suspicion," and that a search performed for this reason will be deemed unreasonable and any evidence thus obtained would not be permissible in court.

231 posted on 11/30/2007 5:52:43 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

The overstepping officer is counting on the citizenry not knowing what their rights are or being in too much of a hurry to demand to have his civil rights respected. By simply saying, “I don’t object if you obtain a search warrant and I’m willing to wait” throws a new spin on the situation.


233 posted on 11/30/2007 6:06:45 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson