Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dionysius

“Refusing a search affords instantaneous probable cause for the warrant, provided the stop is legal.”

Exercising a Constitutional right is considered “probable cause”?


131 posted on 11/29/2007 9:21:42 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: Rb ver. 2.0

It seems to be among the “well if you have nothing to hide” crowd.


135 posted on 11/29/2007 9:28:02 AM PST by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

No.


147 posted on 11/29/2007 10:01:52 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

Exercising one’s right to free speech does not meant that one cannot incriminate himself by so doing. In a similar vein, refusal of a search incident to a lawful stop is an element a judge may take into account when issuing the warrant. Refusal of a search at the airport is a Constitutional right, but what happens? You don’t get on the plane! The exercise of a right does not immunize one from the consequences. By the way, how can you you deem Constitutional rights so sacrosant when Abortion on Demand has been given such status?


151 posted on 11/29/2007 10:12:09 AM PST by Dionysius (Jingoism is no vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson