Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
"Oh no, friend, there were indeed free African Americans in the colonial militias."

I believe it. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some foreign mercenaries, also.

If the federal government wanted to take their weapons, do you believe the U.S. Supreme Court would have ruled back then that Negroes and foreigners had second amendment protection?

Moot point. I was referring to the Militia Act of 1792, and it said nothing about non-whites.

39 posted on 11/27/2007 4:55:06 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen

Moot point notwithstanding, the Supremes at that time would NOT have recognized foreigners or blacks as protected by the BoR. But, the intention of the 2nd Amendment was to allow citizens (”the people”) to keep and bear arms...we just define citizens differently today.


56 posted on 11/27/2007 6:50:35 PM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson