Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: navyguy
I think that interpretation would fall apart on the understanding that women and children were also allowed to own firearms. Slaves obviously weren’t, but they were legally defined as 3/5 of a person at the time (for unrelated reasons).

Cool...slaves could own 3/5ths of a gun...leave off the trigger and the barrel.

16 posted on 11/27/2007 4:18:37 PM PST by Impugn (I am standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Impugn
"Cool...slaves could own 3/5ths of a gun...leave off the trigger and the barrel."

Nah. It means they couldn't own a six-shooter. Only a three-shooter. A real disadvantage.

29 posted on 11/27/2007 4:41:48 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson