Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
We keep circling around this. You keep referring to that clause in Article I Section 2 as implying that the only "people" who had human rights under the Bill of Rights were that subset of the people who qualified as Electors under Article I Section 2

The point that the rest of us are making is that the writers of the Constitution intended for the Bill of Rights to apply to "the people" as the term was generally understood to mean.

154 posted on 11/28/2007 4:29:31 PM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
"implying that the only "people" who had human rights under the Bill of Rights"

No, only "the people" had full rights under the Bill of Rights.

175 posted on 11/29/2007 5:18:52 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson