Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
"it's a state power to arm or disarm citizens at will. Why would you want that?"

That's the same question the Founders asked themselves. So they wrote the second aamendment to prevent the federal government from infringing the ability of a state to arm themselves and form a Militia.

106 posted on 11/28/2007 10:49:09 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
That's the same question the Founders asked themselves. So they wrote the second aamendment to prevent the federal government from infringing the ability of a state to arm themselves and form a Militia.

And we're supposed to believe they wrote it in such a way as to produce exactly what they were trying to prevent.

107 posted on 11/28/2007 10:51:01 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
So they wrote the second aamendment to prevent the federal government from infringing the ability of a state to arm themselves and form a Militia.

By your account they don't have any right to arm themselves until they've formed a well regulated militia. You can't have a well-regulated militia without arms, so we're pretty well screwed. Nice work.

111 posted on 11/28/2007 11:03:34 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson