Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary not ruling out putting impeached husband on ticket as VP.
AM630 WMAL | 11/27/2007 | Kevin

Posted on 11/27/2007 7:56:27 AM PST by LetsRok

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 last
To: John Valentine
It would be political dynamite.

I agree, which is why I noted that it would likely be considered non-justiciable. However, I simply don't think the issue is as cut-and-dried as you make it. I understand your argument, but I think your interpretation defeats the major purpose of the amendment, which was to prevent a "benevolent dictator" and to ensure that there would be no compromise to the separation of powers doctrine, not unlike there was during the FDR administration. By interpreting the language of the 22nd to allow for third term Presidents, it renders much of the point of the amendment useless. That seems like a bad result. We don't like bad results, and we tend to find ways to avoid them.

What's a great way to avoid this bad result? Find that the 22nd Amendment prohibits third term Presidents. Period. Everyone goes home happy.

181 posted on 11/28/2007 5:53:11 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius

In order for a court to rule as you suggest they would have to rule that the drafters of the 22nd really meant to say “No person shall be eligible to serve as President...” but somehow just couldn’t manage to find the right words.

This is a BIG nono in my world.


182 posted on 11/28/2007 6:28:43 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

She never has before. Maybe under Web, Foster, Markie Post or Huma Abedin; but never him.


183 posted on 11/28/2007 11:17:34 AM PST by JosephW (Mohammad Lied, People die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr

Thanks for clearing that up.


184 posted on 11/28/2007 11:18:29 AM PST by listenhillary (You get more of what you focus on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman

Rush made the comment today with Bill campaigning in Iowa to shore up support, it is making Hillary appear to be incapable of winning without Bill Clinton. She’s weak.

That has to mess with the left’s brain cell.


185 posted on 11/28/2007 11:21:48 AM PST by listenhillary (You get more of what you focus on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
So he's free to run as the VP... then she resigns... and let him be president for 4 years. Then he gets another person to run for president, with him as the vp.... get elected and resign.... and he's prsident for 4 more years. Then he gets another person to run ......

This can't have been the intent.

186 posted on 11/28/2007 11:28:33 AM PST by kjam22 (see me play the guitar here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noHy7Cuoucc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

Nothing they DO is legal!!!!! THEY ARE CRIMINALS!


187 posted on 11/28/2007 11:33:08 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

I suspect DJ exaggerating or reporting something unconfirmed. And getting people to go off without checking.


188 posted on 11/28/2007 11:34:32 AM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

Obviously not, but I am pretty sure that no one ever thought to write the amendment around such an outlandishly impossible situation. If any man had the political horsepower and charm to do as you suggest, he’s have the influence to see the 22nd repealed in six months time.


189 posted on 11/28/2007 11:48:10 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson