Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Discover That If You Slam Members of Congress(Good Read)
ESPN.com ^ | Gregg Easterbrook

Posted on 11/26/2007 5:45:08 PM PST by curtisgardner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/26/2007 5:45:11 PM PST by curtisgardner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner

Full Title: Scientists Discover That If You Slam Members of Congress Together Under Pressure, Money Is Released


2 posted on 11/26/2007 5:45:48 PM PST by curtisgardner (A growing economy does not require a constant flow of uneducated labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner

I had one of those Higgs Bison steaks at ted Turners the other night , it was great, and it only cost three million dollars.


3 posted on 11/26/2007 5:52:27 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Interesting that this article critical of fundamental science funding was published on ESPN - the network for jocks?


4 posted on 11/26/2007 5:56:57 PM PST by fremont_steve (Milpitas - a great place to be FROM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner
It is certainly valid to argue against such projects based on role-of-government issues, but as soon as the author wrote:

Assume the Big Bang was how it all began. During this event, vast amounts of matter and radiation materialized from nowhere, the light-speed barrier was broken, space became curved, matter-antimatter annihilation destroyed millions of times the mass of the present universe, and other fairly wild stuff happened. A localized Big Bang Lite caused by a particle accelerator is unlikely, but why are we going out of our way to engage the risk?

and

...physicists privately are hoping the new ultraexpensive atom smashers won't find the ultimate elementary particle, the very thing they are designed to find. Wait -- they are hoping the $30 billion worth of projects will fail? Here's the reasoning: If the machines actually do discover what causes matter, how will science lobbyists justify billions more euros and dollars for additional atom-smasher subsidies in the future?

he became merely a delusional idiot.
5 posted on 11/26/2007 6:04:45 PM PST by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner
"But realistically, who's going to read an entire book in a computer browser pane?"


I've read a lot of books on my hi-def 24" LCD monitor. I use really large print so I can sit back. And judging by Baen books, a lot of people are using their free library and/or buying electronic versions of various new books. Plus, Sony's got their book reader and Amazon's got a new one coming out.

6 posted on 11/26/2007 6:24:25 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newguy357

well regarding the second comment, when a government program works it means it deserves more money because it was successful and we need to invest in success. If the government program does not work then it means that obviously we need more money because it was underfunded.


7 posted on 11/26/2007 6:25:22 PM PST by ari-freedom (CONgress is the opposite of PROgress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner
Scientists Discover That If You Slam Members of Congress

....your blood pressure goes down dramatically
8 posted on 11/26/2007 6:28:02 PM PST by G8 Diplomat (Creatures are divided into 6 kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Monera, Protista, & Saudi Arabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newguy357

Yes, that was a stupid thought. While liberal arts professors make their bones writing about nothing, engineers and scientists get their prestige and earnings from actually doing something. Find nothing and they’ll generally find their funding going bye-bye (ethanol excepted).

Besides, a $15 billion accelerator has a much greater chance of producing benefits than a $15 billion road project in downtown Boston.


9 posted on 11/26/2007 6:28:27 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fremont_steve

It sounds like ESPN.com is just one venue for Mr. Easterbrook.
And that, as for science programs, he gained some reknown for drubbing
the Shuttle Program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregg_Easterbrook


10 posted on 11/26/2007 6:33:46 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom; neverdem; patton; sionnsar
I would definitely “quibble” with him for funding - but NOT because tracking down the Higgs bosun is particularly important.

The technology we needed (still need!) for the super collider project - canceled by Clinton because it was going to be built in Bush’s Texas! - is the business and engineering of superconductors, ultra-high-speed control of physics particle packages at ultra-high speeds in magnetic fields, high-density superconducting magnetic containments, magnetic bottles, super-conducting fluids and low temperature engineering ...

Everything, in short, needed for a fusion power plant.

11 posted on 11/26/2007 6:46:40 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LenS
The annual budget for a collider is just about the same as for a large (government-funded-liberal-artsy) symphony, or opera, or arts museum.....

Construction funding is higher, but more people get something from the collider, on a per-person basis, if you consider the 2nd & 3rd tier results.

12 posted on 11/26/2007 6:48:56 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newguy357
Since he was quoting Science magazine, "physicists privately are hoping the new ultraexpensive atom smashers won't find the ultimate elementary particle," you must think all the scientist that magazine represents are "delusional idiots," as well.

You might be right, actually, since science has stopped doing science and has resorted to promoting some sort of "scientific agenda" which persecutes anyone who attempts to question it. Think global warming, psychology, evolution, etc. etc. etc. (I'm an atheist, by the way. I do not believe in intelligent design--to much of it is absurd to be intelligent--nor in any current explanation of evolution, which is equally absurd, and totally with evidence.)

Hank

13 posted on 11/26/2007 6:51:21 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LenS

if they don’t find anything they’ll still get funding from the govt or a grant from govt subsidized universities. That’s why you have tenured liberal arts professors in the first place.


14 posted on 11/26/2007 6:51:53 PM PST by ari-freedom (CONgress is the opposite of PROgress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LenS
I read entire books on my Palm (gutenberg.org).

I heard a quote attributed to Oppenheimer. In a handful of years, they discovered about 150 particles. Oppenheimer said "...the Nobel physics prize should go to the physicist that did not discover a new particle."

So Easterbrook thinks they're on the verge of running out of particles?

In regular matter? How about "dark matter"? Opens up all sorts of new areas to explore.

15 posted on 11/26/2007 6:52:16 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Everything, in short, needed for a fusion power plant.

Oh, yeah! Tokamak anyone? Did I spell that right? It's been so long, ya know. Indeed, it has been a long time since I heard, "...in the next ten years, we'll have fusion power..." yawn

16 posted on 11/26/2007 7:23:45 PM PST by VRW Conspirator (The chief business of the American people is business. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner
Wow. Just...wow.

I've seen the deeply ignorant. I've seen the aggressively ignorant (they tend to spout creationism on FR). But not often have I seen the viciously ignorant.

I could deconstruct this article line-by-line--almost every sentence is flatly wrong--but my time would be better spent writing up last night's Eagles game, since ESPN has seen fit to write this instead.

Instead, I'll just point out that when I left physics for programming, my salary doubled, and the work was a hell of a lot easier. Physicists make real sacrifices to do physics. This talk about how physics research is mere "featherbedding" is simply intellectual class warfare.

17 posted on 11/26/2007 7:30:00 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

thanks, bfl


18 posted on 11/26/2007 7:44:43 PM PST by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

And the gamma knife research that resulted is a benefit that many cancer patients see.


19 posted on 11/26/2007 8:07:38 PM PST by tbw2 (Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Deconstruct it!
I dare you.
When you have time...LOL!


20 posted on 11/26/2007 8:17:37 PM PST by sarasmom (How many guns do I need? How many pencils, fishing rods,screwdrivers or golf clubs do you need?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson