Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG
But you are supporting it! If you don’t take action against it, you’re allowing it when you had the opportunity to not allow it.

Your position assumes a single method of action, a method I do not subscribe to.

I have no ability to allow or deny anything, but merely a choice to lend my support or not, or to place my support elsewhere. If the republicans do not field a Conservative candidate, I will not support the Republicans. It is really that simple.

531 posted on 11/25/2007 10:56:15 PM PST by roamer_1 (Vote for HuFrudMcRomsonbee -Turn red states purple in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]


To: roamer_1

You are correct that we are taking two different approaches.

Yours is abstract, as in “support” and so on.

Mine is concrete, as in casting an actual vote that is counted a particular way.

That particular way is within a two-party system where the election is a zero-sum game. Every vote is a vote counted (even if not intended as such) as FOR one candidate and AGAINST the other. So this is where it’s my turn to say “it’s really as simple as that.”

I don’t look at a vote as “supporting” anyone or anything. Since one of the two candidates WILL be elected, then my vote can only have a “single method of action.” It can only help candidate A or candidate B and their respective parties.

You DO have the ability to allow or deny a given result in the election. It’s not about whether you “support” the candidate or the party. It’s about the result of the election, and your vote determines that.


545 posted on 11/25/2007 11:45:57 PM PST by fightinJAG ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson