Fact is that the man went and served. That's plenty honorable. It's the claims (no matter whether Hunter or his friends made them) that are not in accordance with available evidence that bother me.
My objections to Hunter as a candidate are that he hasn't seen a country that he wouldn't invade. Enough American blood and treasure has been spilled and spent for somebody else's problems.
The guy needs to stop dragging his knuckles in the dirt, and realise that a border fence and invading everybody who irritates us is not a smart foreign policy. While the fence thing is a good start, it will not provide a permenant answer to our problems with immigration.
The only job the government is supposed to do for the people is to defend and protect this country. If that means action abroad, then so be it.
If you don’t know that Duncan Hunter is responsible for rebuilding our defenses practically destroyed by the Clinton administration, and strongly favors a peace through strength policy, you know nothing about Duncan Hunter.
I choose to ignore your spastic description (dragging his knuckles in the dirt!!!!) of this fine statesmen who has given 27 years of his life fighting for what is right for this country!