200 Reasons Why the Election Matters

The Weekly Standard ^ | 12/03/2007, Volume 013, Issue 12 | Terry Eastland

[misterrob]

But everyone here knows that Rooty will only appoint cross dressing transgender judges that Hillary would find too liberal for her taste.

[rellimpank]

---It is also an issue that voters, distracted by the horse-race aspect of the long campaign, may have to be reminded about, and often.--

--and it unfortunately is an issue that a majority of voters don't understand or care about---

[RepRivFarm]

But everyone here knows that Rooty will only appoint cross dressing transgender judges that Hillary would find too liberal for her taste.

Given Rudy's history, I congratulate you on the accuracy of your post

[Condor51]

**** But everyone here knows that Rooty will only appoint cross dressing transgender judges that Hillary would find too liberal for her taste. ****

Well, since Rooty keeps saying "Look what I did in NYC", I concur - he will.
(not sarcasm)

[CRBDeuce]

As with Rudy, to the best of my knowledge Romney ONLY appointed liberal judges in Taxachussetts, knowing that’s the only kind he could appoint. Not sure how many of the judges Dubya appointed were liberal for the same reason. Now if we could find a conservative law school somewhere on the planet, mebbe we could fix that.

[Hildy]

Everyone here is delusionsal when it comes to this issue. Rudy will appoint Conservative judges....HILLARY WON’T.

[misterrob]

If the Dems control the Senate then you can forget about any conservatives being appointed to key judiciary slots.

I refuse to believe that Rudy will be worse than Hillary. If he wins the primaries and gets the nod then I’ll vote him not because I want to but because of what Hillary and the rest of the dems will do if back in power.

[misterrob]

And how liberal did the Clinton agenda get to be with Newt in charge of the House? Bottom line is that your party needs to own Congress to get much of anything done.

[pookie18]

Agreed!

[EternalVigilance]

Rudy will appoint Conservative judges....HILLARY WON’T.

"Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." - Rudy Giuliani

[Phlap]

Conservatives that don’t vote will get what they deserve. Hillary. Its not a maybe. Regardless of who wins the GOP nomination, Hillary will be worse. That is also not a maybe. Complaining there is no “real” conservative and not voting won’t change the fact there is a “real” election.

[Afronaut]

Once again the well trained vote has surfaced with the fear factor in the modern election cycle. You must vote for the anointed one on the GOP side or else we will have Hilary... OOOOO the old Boogie man under the bed story.

This (the Boogie man) will keep you in check for the remainder of your life and the GOP can always count on your vote.

What a great racket this GOP has going.

[Norman Bates]

Ping

[Clintonfatigued]

This is so true. Hillary Clinton’s husband appointed over 300 Federal judges. That’s more than enough Clinton judges.

[Hildy]

Yea, I admit it, I’m freaking afraid of Hillary Clinton and the posse she brings to town with her. If you’re not, you’re kinda scary yourself.

[misterrob]

It’s not the GOP it’s the registered R’s that would bring Rudy to the nomination. I won’t vote for him in the primaries but Hillary has the potential to set this country back in ways that are hard to consider. If Thompson, Hunter, Romney or anyone else out there cannot beat Rudy then that’s their fault for being inferior candidates.

[misterrob]

Besides all the feminists that she will appoint to administration positions we get more gay agenda and other “progressive” thinkers in charge of policy. Rudy would have to listen to conservatives, Hillary would simply tell them to stuff it.

[Norman Bates]

This is one area why we must win next year: SCOTUS is on the line but we cannot forget the dozens and dozens and Carter, Reagan, Bush I, and early Clinton judges that we be retiring in the next 4 years. This is one area where I see McCain having an advantage with him having been witness to every SCOTUS confirmation battle since 1987 (including Bork), and hundreds of lesser judges. He’ll know what it takes to get a good judge through the Senate. But if not, anyone is better than Hillary.

[Hildy]

Of course.