To: joylyn
Yes, Camilla was waaaaay better than Diana, because an adulterous woman is sooooo much more superior than one with bulemia. /sarc
Still don't understand Charles ditching Di. [shrugs]
120 posted on
11/24/2007 9:06:48 AM PST by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud RUSH REPUBLICAN! WIN, FRED, WIN!!!)
To: pillut48
You don't understand Charles "ditching Di?".?
I guess if you found out one of your Royal sons wasn't fathered by YOU, you'd just forgive and forget? Rubbish!
sw
122 posted on
11/24/2007 9:09:27 AM PST by
spectre
(spectre's wife (It's Illegal immigration, Stupid)
To: pillut48
For what it’s worth, Di and Camilla were both adulterers. At least Camilla confined herself to one outside interest, as far as we know. Also, Camilla was relatively discreet. She didn’t put her friends up to gabbing to tabloid reporters, make hundreds of crank phone calls to lovers who threw her over, and sleep with men who would later “tell all.”
179 posted on
11/24/2007 2:13:31 PM PST by
joylyn
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson