I found an article earlier today about the stone fence. According to the property owner, the judge had erected a steel fence between her property and the wall prior to bringing the action, so I don’t think that it was a good application of the law, assuming that happened. That would be an admission that the judge knew that the stone wall was not hers.
http://www.denverpost.com/keefe/ci_7557747
The problem here isn't the law, but the judges applying it.