Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jude24

Squatter’s rights do not create ownership of the fee; they are only a vehicle toward a prescriptive easement of surface rights. That’s not what adverse possession is about. Because of the tax being paid by the advewrse occupant, the fee is what is under attack.


27 posted on 11/22/2007 1:36:44 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

That’s not a big deal. Down here in Comanche county TX, we have a County Judge who takes possession of elderly senile couples property and sells it for his personal benefit.
Small county and you can’t touch the thief.
There should be a law against this, and there is. But those who enforce the laws also know how to profit from selective/creative enforcement.


32 posted on 11/22/2007 2:30:11 PM PST by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson