Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: epow

I just don’t see them saying anything other than that it is an individual right. Not the Roberts/Alito court.


5 posted on 11/21/2007 6:25:42 AM PST by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: farlander

Bingo....


6 posted on 11/21/2007 6:26:43 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
I just don’t see them saying anything other than that it is an individual right.

Then why not let the appellate judgment stand without review?

31 posted on 11/21/2007 7:31:02 AM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

While SCOTUS may side with the constitution they are likely to put some phrase like “reasonable” that will only make things worse.


32 posted on 11/21/2007 7:33:20 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Truthism Watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

5-4 against the individual’s right to own firearms.


37 posted on 11/21/2007 8:03:21 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson