Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk
That will have to be Jonah Goldberg's problem. He has his moments but not as an intellectual leader of conservatism

No but he is the editor of the National Review. I think you're just upset that for the most part the Republican party is falling apart at the seams. About time too. Yes I said it. Republicans have played at conservatism for far too long and have practically destroyed the conservative movement in less than 20 years.

but he forgot that the interior of the paleomushball's "mind" most resembles the quiet orderliness of the "minds" of a Charles Manson, a Jeffrey Dahlmer, or a twisted version of Ted Bundy or the Unibomber, not necessarily their results although Paulistinian peacecreepology and general lunacy, if policy, would bring about the death by Jihad of many more defenseless Americans and Israelis than those four could kill

Whew, what do you smoke to come up with this crap? You should sell it, you'd make a million dollars (course the way the dollar's going, you'd only make half that next week)

Do you applaud Goldwater as a former Senatorial one-man cheering section for abortion, including the abortion of his own innocent grandchild in which he was morally complicit?

Whether or not he was complicit is his business and his alone. I do not agree with abortion, however it was intended to be an issue for the separate and sovereign states (now please blindly post the 14th Amendment, 5th Amendment and Preamble if you will. I've come to the realization you're just a mouthpiece who doesn't think for himself so go ahead and cut and paste).

Mona Charen is a lot better than Jonah Goldberg generally. Just about anyone is better than the paleopipsquek. 44 days to the ciderpress that will eliminate paleoPaulie from American politics. Tick, tick, tick.....

Yep that seals it. While even detractors of Dr. Paul are calling Ms. Charen out on her 'hit piece', the blind 'faithful' still lap it up.

35 posted on 11/20/2007 1:58:48 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: billbears; Tax-chick
BB: If you think that the murder of Goldwater's grandchild (with his complicity and unseemly enthusiasm) was his business and his alone (presumably along with his daughter, the murder victim and the victim's dad), that alone is sufficient explanation of why the words "conservative movement" do not apply to you. Goldwater's first wife Peggy was a Planned Barrenhood National Board member from the purge of Sanger and her most embarrassing Nazi sympathizers and collaborators in 1940 to Peggy's death in the mid-1970s.

Manson, Dahlmer, Bundy and the Unibomber were small fry in the murder business compared to Sanger and the Goldwaters and their public policies. Of course, M, D, B and U never had the effrontery to claim a "right to privacy" as a cover for their far less numerous crimes. For someone who CLAIMS not to "agree" with abortion (whatever that may mean), you sure do militantly defend Dr. Do Nothing who wants to pose for pro-life holy pictures while resisting quite constitutional attempts to end the holocaust and also defend Barry the baby killer and his Planned Barrenhood allies in their resistance to federal pro-life action. To actual pro-lifers, the libertoonian mouths seem to be ready to accept the overturn of Roe vs. Wade so long as NY, CA, IL, and the more Demonratic states can keep their baby-killing mills open under faux "federalism."

Offended by the 5th and 14th amendments??? Quelle surprise! The 5th precedes and the 14th succeeds (modifying as necessary) the 10th amendment. I don't remember ever relying on the words of the Preamble. Show me an example.

Are you forgetting that the freedom to use "free market pharmaceuticals" along with freedom to engage in sodomy and babykilling are the three cardinal "virtues" of libertoonianism and therefore second-cousins of paleowhateverism????

As to the health of the GOP, it will be far healthier and likely dominant when we have run the paleowindtunnels out of the party altogether. Pacifism is NOT conservatism. Anti-military attitudes are NOT conservatism. Anal retentive materialism cubed is NOT conservatism. The principle of subsidiarity (a Catholic Church principle long before Lincoln CLAIMED to discover it) has its place in law but NOT at the expense of 50 million innocent babies' lives whatever the hillbillies or the Sangerites may think.

The last time there was a conservative movement was the 1980 landslide election of Ronald Reagan (produced by bringing millions of social conservative Democrats into the GOP). There was a third party peacecreep faux Republican (John Anderson) in that race.

Have paleoPaulie do the honors as a third party antiAmerican this time and take the nutcase antiAmerican left vote from Hitlery (who is feared by them to be insufficiently antiAmerican). They know that paleofraudman is opposed to federal action against their secular sacraments of drugs, abortion and sodomy and just as opposed as he is to American interests. They can trust paleoPaulie to be paleopaulie or Tom Fleming or Llewelyn Rockwell or Justin(e) Raimondo or Weepy Walter Jones or whatever antiAmerican jerk poses as "paleo."

If you imagine that I do not think, then I will take that as the compliment that it is, considering the source.

43 days until paleoPaulie and his love slaves are ciderized by actual voters. Tick, tick, tick...

Tax-Chick: A billbears update.

59 posted on 11/21/2007 10:12:51 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson