“We got news for ya:
ID is NOT, in any way, a science, or scientific.
It has no way to test its “theory”, does not explain how things got the way they are, and offers ZERO evidence to back up its assertions.
IS IS simply creationism by another name.
Admit this truth and move on.”
I can make much the same argument for Big Bangism. Please provide evidence from before the Big Bang.
I think science and intelligent design are quite compatible. You obviously haven’t read Goedel’s incompleteness theorem.
Goedel’s work may not be complete, but at least it’s internally consistent.
No, wait...
Goedel’s work is complete but contains internal inconsistencies.
I can never make up my mind on this one.