Replies

After all, we need to do something while waiting for the scientific evidence for ID to be published.

"Galileo, let us Aristotleans see your unscientific evidence for heliocentrism!"

"It's scientific, and it's an easier explanation for epicycles than..."

"Silence! The epicycles are evidence for geocentrism! The celestial bodies dance around the Earth, as we can all see with our own eyes! Geocentrism is observable, empirical science and heliocentrism is not! Present your evidence!"

"But the evidence lies in the unlikely fashion of the epicycles, dancing of these bodies..."

"UNLIKELY?! Why, all natural bodies move around in dances and wobbles, this is indisputable! Your 'theory' proposes that the heavenly spheres move in perfect circles, and this has never been observed! Circles are UNLIKELY! Do you have any REAL evidence?"

"Well, they're not actually perfect circles..."

"WHAT? Well then what kind of evidence is that? None at all! HAND HIM OVER TO THE INQUISITOR!"

ROFL!

ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because ID is not science because it's never been researched, and anybody who does research on ID is not doing science because...

ID is not science because it does not produce falsifiable hyptheses. But anyone who support ID don’t know what sceince is or what science does. That’s the root of the problem. ID supporters are creationists trying to overturn sciecne so they can ram their superstitious beliefs down the throats of children, and without a care about how bad their science backgrounds will be. ID is a deception in the step to another dark age where the Chruch ruled and everyone was Christian.