Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc30
From seeing the program I remember the falsification criteria he gave was one that assumes ‘intelligent design’ until an ‘innovation’ sufficiently complex to not be able to arise by random mutation and natural selection is seen to develop in an experimental population. Of course any that do develop will be understood to be modifications of existing DNA that will produce modified proteins with different functions, and so the ‘complexity’ will no longer be ‘irreducible’.

For example if one took bacteria with the secretory apparatus that is the reducible complexity in the supposedly ‘irreducibly complex’ flagella, and selected them for mobility, would a flagella develop? At present the Dyscovery Institute is NOT pursuing this research.

211 posted on 12/04/2007 6:46:52 AM PST by allmendream ("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD (Hunter 08))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

What I am waiting for is an explanation of how the design is implemented in the construction of a new organism. No one wants to answer that one.


216 posted on 12/04/2007 8:16:28 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson