Dover was a very fair ruling and it followed all the legal norms of this country. The defendants had the legal counsel of their choosing. It's not their fault they chose a bunch on incompentents from the Thomas Moore Law Center. But it is the defendants' fault for lying under oath. The claim that the judge was biased only happened after the school board lost in court. The cdesign proponentists simply cannot accept they lost. They cannot conceive of being fundamentally wrong. Their religious dogma has completely blinded them to reality, just like for you.
Ahhhh, the ‘Cdesign proponentist’; the fables missing link between a creationist and a I.D. proponent.
Incompetent legal counsel! That is a laugh! Like someone who murders their parents throwing themselves upon the mercy of the court as an orphan. You lay down with dogs...
The judge was asked to rule if I.D. was Science, but when he did so he suddenly became an ‘activist Judge’. And when he followed Standard Operating Procedure for a legal decision and included the argument of the winning side (it was the legal argument that the judge found convincing after all), suddenly he was a handmaiden of the ACLU.
Ahhh, logic and truth and fair-play. None of these things have been ‘discovered’ by cdesign proponetists at the Dyscovery institute.