Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
On the other hand, I find it hard to conceive of any development of modern science except that the belief of scientists in intelligent design, by which I mean what Whitehead said about the matter.

I don't understand this reference. Please explain in a bit more detail. Thanks.

190 posted on 12/03/2007 10:22:32 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

Whitehead began with the observation that science arose against a background of belief in a Creator God—the Judeo-Christian God—and Greek rationalism. Unlike Greek scientists, like Aristotle, the Europeans believed in a linear progression of events. Unlike the Muslims, who became weighted down by fundamentalism, they believed that God —and his creation—could be known by reason. By extension one may look at the view of the Positivists which was that theology was superceded by science, each confident that truth could be know by the application of reason, although science focuses on what is near at hand rather than metaphysical truth or knowledge of God.


192 posted on 12/03/2007 10:40:56 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson