so basically you’re saying “Nature dun it and that’s good enough for me,. no need to explain or even investigate”? Lol- 9 times out of ten eh? Got any stats on that?
Allergy to evidence eh? Lol- like the allergy to devestating evidence against Macroevolution? That kind of allergy?
When you can show that highly complex irreducible systems ARE infact “Nature dun doing it” then by all means, present it here- until then, it would appear you have an allergy to evidence that suggests that a designer is infact needed to assemble highly complex irreducible organsisms
Oh, and by the way, for htose that care about the truth- the ‘stepwise organizations’ Ahayes refers to are absolutely moot systems of overly simplistic elements that follow natural laws- not the highly complex irreducibly complex systems that supposedly broke every natural law known to man in order to assemble TRILLIONS of higher and higher ‘stepwise organizations’ to create ever increasing, ever law breaking highly complex systems.
Nice try Ahayes, but if you’re going to deride somethign you don’t agree with- at least be intellectually honest about it!
Oh yeah, speaking of intellectual honesy, I’m willing to accept an apology for you calling me a blatant liar for quoting Behe any time you’re ready to offer it.
Oh, and I'm saying creationist engineers say Goddidit and don't bother to investigate--in case it escaped your attention, engineers do not study the natural world.