[cmwy]

does not the framing of the question suggest that individuals not affiliated with militias have some rights and the court hopes to decide if these laws violate those rights. If so a ruling could still be rather non-definitive

[ctdonath2]

As I see it, the question presumes an individual right as it clearly deliniates the question as setting outside anything that could be deemed a “collective right” - so in a sense, we’ve already won. The court will be hard-pressed to answer “no” to their own question as posed.