Re-wording the second amendment to books is off-topic. That's what I meant.
Then you are absolutely wrong. Your mis-interpretation of the Second Amendment depends completely on the inclusion and wording of the militia clause. Here's a one question SAT test for you:
Which two of the following four sentences are most alike:
A) A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
B) Because, among other possible reasons, a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the pre-existing right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
C) Only because a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms when members of such Militia shall not be infringed.
D) The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
I suggest that you find somebody whose skill in grammar you respect to take this test with you. Let us know the results.