Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"the debates surrounding congressional approval of the second amendment do contain references to individual self-protection"

The ones that I've seen refer to, "the right to bear arms for the protection of self and country" or some variation of that. But in the 18th century, to "bear arms" meant to carry them into battle -- so to protect self was to protect self in battle.

153 posted on 11/20/2007 5:24:22 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen

Really, you have a link for that? The word “bear” in the 18th century to my knowledge meant to carry or hold and not much different from today’s application of the word.


154 posted on 11/20/2007 5:38:18 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
But in the 18th century, to "bear arms" meant to carry them into battle -- so to protect self was to protect self in battle.

Unbelievable.....

155 posted on 11/20/2007 5:39:27 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxtOf course, the second amendment only pr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen

How do you think a Supreme Court decision in this matter will affect the several state constitutions that appear to define the right to keep and bear arms as an individual right?


172 posted on 11/20/2007 9:33:04 PM PST by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson