To: Reaganwuzthebest
"the debates surrounding congressional approval of the second amendment do contain references to individual self-protection"The ones that I've seen refer to, "the right to bear arms for the protection of self and country" or some variation of that. But in the 18th century, to "bear arms" meant to carry them into battle -- so to protect self was to protect self in battle.
To: robertpaulsen
Really, you have a link for that? The word “bear” in the 18th century to my knowledge meant to carry or hold and not much different from today’s application of the word.
To: robertpaulsen
But in the 18th century, to "bear arms" meant to carry them into battle -- so to protect self was to protect self in battle. Unbelievable.....
155 posted on
11/20/2007 5:39:27 PM PST by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxtOf course, the second amendment only pr)
To: robertpaulsen
How do you think a Supreme Court decision in this matter will affect the several state constitutions that appear to define the right to keep and bear arms as an individual right?
172 posted on
11/20/2007 9:33:04 PM PST by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson