Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack
Nor to the "defense" of the Union ...

What is there to dispraise in the defense of the Union?

172 posted on 11/19/2007 1:27:00 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
What is there to dispraise in the defense of the Union?

1) Lincoln's suspension of numerous constitutional rights (habeus corpus, free press, e.g.);
2) The destruction of states' rights as an operative political doctrine, and the substitution of non-negotiable federalism;
3) The first pass at an income tax;
4) The corruption of the procurement process for Union supplies and materiel;
5) The lukewarm and ineffective way in which the war was waged under Scott, McClellan, & Co. in the early stages;
6) A lasting legacy of overbearing paternalism that borders on hubris, that defies the spirit of this nation's founding, and that has been exploited to force unconscionable uniformity throughout a polyglot culture.

Other than that ...

Another poster had it right: BOTH sides can claim their heros and their scoundrels. To suggest that Confederate soldiers were not driven as much by honor as Union troops is absurd and chauvinistic.

195 posted on 11/19/2007 3:08:17 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson