Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: incindiary
Good afternoon.
“Instead of replying with another question, just answer my original question.”

I can’t do that, FRiend. Since I’m sure that the threat is there and that W cares very much about the security of the nation, it’s not a simple case of if this then that. As to why W hasn’t dealt with the border, as I said, it’s incomprehensible.

How’s that? Now show me where I did more than ask you a couple of questions and then answer mine. Do you believe the threat isn’t there and do you think that W’s failure is relevant to what I believe RP’s will be?

I do apologize for implying that the Paul camp is more illogical than some of the others.

Michael Frazier

232 posted on 11/19/2007 3:44:27 PM PST by brazzaville (No surrender, no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: brazzaville
Thanks for your reply.

"Do you believe the threat isn’t there and do you think that W’s failure is relevant to what I believe RP’s will be?"

I do believe there is a threat, but at the same time, I have gotten to the point where I just don't trust Dubya at all anymore. So I'm leaning towards thinking that the threat is greatly exaggerated, to keep people gung ho about the war. If I'm wrong about that, and the terrorist threat to us IS great, then he should have closed the borders long ago, and shown more concern about who is getting into the country.

235 posted on 11/19/2007 4:08:47 PM PST by incindiary (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJDqneN4weE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson