And skip the crap like this in your response, you do reflect on Paul's credibility.
So then would you regard Jews (who are circumcised for religious reasons) as having "sacred magic penises"? (Maybe SJackson will insist they are, LOL, he can address that if he likes). But then would the yarmulke be considered a "sacred magic hat"?Nice use of quoting out of context and avoiding posting a link so others can see the discussion. You must have been saving that one up. The topic on that other thread was criticism of the "sacred magic underwear" of Mormons and I was addressing the issue of hats, undergarments and surgery in the religious context. BTW, I won that argument but I'm enjoying how you're trying to propagandize it.
Sorry, here's the link, even the full comment, my bold. Worth noting for anyone reading this, I wasn't posting on the thread, and have asked you in the past not to ping me to unrelated threads.
I think it's another of many examples of the offensive nature of most of Paul's web supporters, others can make up their own mind.
So then would you regard Jews (who are circumcised for religious reasons) as having "sacred magic penises"? (Maybe SJackson will insist they are, LOL, he can address that if he likes). But then would the yarmulke be considered a "sacred magic hat"?Is that what you actually believe? If not, how can you be anything but some kind of bigot against Mormonism and employing a double-standard on Mormons that you would not apply to Jews? The very idea that you would apply it to Mormons and not to Jews indicates you're a shallow thinker or might hold to a certain repugnant ideology which you are not admitting publicly here at FR.
Admittedly, it's a peculiar and rarely heard argument but I don't think Jews would hesitate to discuss it if it came up in debate among libs or Dims or among Jews themselves. Jews have had a pretty blunt way of debating these matters for thousands of years. So I don't think this post is over the line. SJackson is free to flag the mods to remove it if I've stepped in the Big Doodoo unintentionally. And I do support the right of families to circumcise or not to circumcise for either religious or health reasons.
The post is obviously meant to get a reaction, as I noted I didn't post on the thread, and it's completly unrelated to any other threads I've posted to you on.