Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dano1
I read it just fine. It's you who is refusing to hear what he said.

Here's another example:

Brian: Ok, now, um, this is…my personal opinion is that it [Roe v. Wade] should be overturned and at the VERY least kicked back to the states…

Governor Huckabee: Mm-hmm.

Brian: …so do you think this should be a state issue if you couldn’t get it passed, or…?

Governor Huckabee: Well, if was overturned, frankly it would be passed back to the states, because that’s all Roe v. Wade really did was to take it away from the states and federalize it. So the states would have it. In my state, for example, it would have automatically have been settled, since we already have a constitutional provision to deal with, uh, the right to a human, uh, the right to sanctity of life.

But obviously I think the ultimate goal is that we would never be a society that would terminate the life of a completely innocent human being.

Yeah, it’s best left to the states. I mean, life is either life or it isn’t. I recognize that you often get what you get in increments, and if there was a law that said that there were exceptions for the physical life — not, you know, just this wide definition of “gee I don’t feel well” or “it’s going to make me upset” – but for the physical life of the mother, in that case you’re really not trying to take a life, you’re trying to save all the lives, you realize there may be one of those rare occasions where if you can’t save one you’re not going to criminalize the doctor for having saved all the lives he can.

(Mike Huckabee interview with IowaVoice.com, Sunday, August 5, 2007)

79 posted on 11/18/2007 1:03:22 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Our God-given rights, and those of our posterity, are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
No, again in Post 79 above you are taking a few words out of context. In the first few words of his response Huckabee is merely rephrasing the gist of the question.

Huckabee then goes on to refute the point that it is for the States to decide. You have to read the whole sentence to get the meaning.

111 posted on 11/18/2007 1:50:50 PM PST by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson