Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dano1
Personally, I think Thompson is using the States rights issue as a convenient "cop out".

If you think keeping abortion within the sole purview of the Feds(Dems) is going to result in an across the board ban; then you're delusional.

Withing the present framework you are never going to get a federal ban. There's an alternate definition for a word that goes something like this: 'doing the same thing and expecting different results.' The word: Insanity.

I suppose it is desirable to you to have a federal ban, but the question is; would you prefer to go for a federal ban, that you're never likely to get, or go with a 25~50% ban on the state level and work from there?

We've been trying for about 30 years now to ban it, and we're not making much headway.

Time to change tactics.

33 posted on 11/18/2007 12:38:52 PM PST by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: AFreeBird
We've been trying for about 30 years now to ban it, and we're not making much headway.

Actually, that's the one thing our "leaders" HAVE NOT been trying to do.

39 posted on 11/18/2007 12:40:36 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Our God-given rights, and those of our posterity, are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson