You're half right, they are both wrong. It seems they both are willing to relinquish a tool in the fight against this intrinsic evil. It doesn't have to be either/or, and I have heard no good arguments that one approach is any better than the other. One approach is NOT anymore constitutional than the other.
All the approaches being discussed are Constitutional, and I have yet to see anyone make a valid argument that either approach isn't. One approach takes nothing away from the other. This is pure propaganda and spin, and quite frankly it makes no sense to me to have this fight. Fred says, "only States Rights", and Huck says, "only a Constitutional Amendment". This is a Problem. I have a solution, and his name is Duncan Lee Hunter.
Wrong, there are post on this thread where, flip flopping huckster, in his own words, was on both sides, the constitution is only his latest.