Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiKev

I can see some use for hydrogen. Not to produce electricity, since as you say it is much more efficient to use your primary energy source (solar, nuclear, etc) to produce the electricity directly rather than to waste energy extracting hydrogen to burn to produce electricity.

But imagine for a moment a sane US. I know, it’s impossible, but just imagine it. And imagine we had a very large number of nuclear reactors, and we extracted huge amounts of hydrogen from water or methane and used that hydrogen to power our cars.

Just think of all those useless and powerless ragheads sitting off in their deserts pounding sand up their butts. Isn’t that a dream worth working towards?


10 posted on 11/17/2007 4:47:44 AM PST by samtheman (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman
"Not to produce electricity, since as you say it is much more efficient to use your primary energy source (solar, nuclear, etc) to produce the electricity directly rather than to waste energy extracting hydrogen to burn to produce electricity."

It depends. If you do large-scale solar in the desert Southwest, and need to get the energy to New York, transmission of hydrogen by pipeline is more efficient than trying to transmit the electricity directly.

22 posted on 11/17/2007 6:00:30 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson