Skip to comments.
Chinese Scientists Conclude Wushan Man Is Oldest Human Fossil In China
All Headlines News ^
| 11-16-2007
| Windsor Genova
Posted on 11/16/2007 11:03:36 AM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
11/16/2007 11:03:39 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
I wonder if they can get mitochondrial DNA from the teeth.
2
posted on
11/16/2007 11:04:51 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: SunkenCiv
GGG Ping.
Three Little Gorges - - Wusha Man
Homo Erectus, of the early Paleolithic Age, unearthed in Longgupo of Wushan County, Sichuan Province in 1988 was a wonderful discovery. The fossilized remains comprised an incisor, two molars, a mandible and some animal fossils of the Early Pleistocene Era. Thus, it is estimated that Wushan's Homo Erectus lived in the Early Pleistocene Era, about 2,000,000 years ago. In comparison to Beijing Man, Wushan's Homo Erectus bore many similarities to modern humans. For example, their teeth resembled those of modern humans, although they were much stronger, although not as strong as those of Beijing Man.
3
posted on
11/16/2007 11:07:08 AM PST
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
Wushan Man is so old that Helen Thomas was his den mother when he was in the Cub Scouts.
To: blam
Chinese Scientists Conclude Wushan Man Is Oldest Human Fossil In China meanwhile, in a related story...
American Scientists Conclude West Virginia Man Is Oldest Human Fossil In Senate
WAY TO GO "SHEETS"!
5
posted on
11/16/2007 11:07:38 AM PST
by
DocH
(RINO-rudy for BRONX Dog Catcher 2008!!!)
To: blam
“..and more than 230 pieces of stone tools..”
What? No chopsticks yet?
6
posted on
11/16/2007 11:08:17 AM PST
by
353FMG
(Government is the opiate of the masses.)
To: blam
7
posted on
11/16/2007 11:09:14 AM PST
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: mysterio; Coyoteman
There were no teeth, it was a fossil.
Doctor Coyoteman, any thing you can add?
8
posted on
11/16/2007 11:09:16 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: blam

I knew him well, Grasshopper!.........
9
posted on
11/16/2007 11:11:21 AM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: blam
IBHTP!
(in before the helen thomas pic)
10
posted on
11/16/2007 11:13:23 AM PST
by
woollyone
(entropy extirpates evolution and conservation confirms the Creator blessed forever.)
To: ASA Vet
The lower jawbone fragment, an incisor
From
pubmedcentral
:
"And, intriguingly, mitochondrial DNA has now been extracted from Quaternary fossil teeth, allowing fossil samples to be placed in the same population genetic framework as extant populations living in the same geographic area"
11
posted on
11/16/2007 11:16:35 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: ASA Vet
There were no teeth, it was a fossil. Doctor Coyoteman, any thing you can add?
I think getting DNA from this one would be difficult.
But, the technology is improving every year, so it may someday be possible.
(Fossil DNA? How would you amplify that? Maybe some of the remote sensing techniques would be of more use than typical genetic procedures.)
12
posted on
11/16/2007 11:19:29 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: blam
Wushan Man? wasn’t that a hit single by the Spinners?
13
posted on
11/16/2007 11:22:48 AM PST
by
rahbert
To: blam
I am shocked, shocked, to find that no-one has yet posted a picture of Helen Thomas on this thread.
14
posted on
11/16/2007 11:26:00 AM PST
by
Disambiguator
(Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
To: mysterio
Further readings indicate I was wrong in my assumption regarding dna not being possible. I’m an old fart but am not too old to learn, or to enjoy Kobe Tai.
15
posted on
11/16/2007 11:26:27 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: mysterio
The lower jawbone fragment, an incisor From pubmedcentral
: "And, intriguingly, mitochondrial DNA has now been extracted from Quaternary fossil teeth, allowing fossil samples to be placed in the same population genetic framework as extant populations living in the same geographic area"
The above case is only 2,400 years old. They have Neanderthal DNA much older than that.
But I think 2 million years will be a challenge for a while to come for DNA studies.
16
posted on
11/16/2007 11:27:27 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: ASA Vet
I only know about it because a girl I went to grad school with was extracting DNA from fossil teeth for some project.
That girl wasn't Kobe Tai, though. :)
17
posted on
11/16/2007 11:30:53 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
It sure would provide some interesting data if we could do it. It would confirm a lot of data about the neutral mutation rate I would imagine, as well as showing if he was at all an ancestor of modern man including modern Chinese.
To: mysterio
Kobe certainly has grad school level skills and could extract samples from this old fossil.
19
posted on
11/16/2007 11:36:32 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: Coyoteman
But I think 2 million years will be a challenge for a while to come for DNA studies.
Yeah, that is a pretty old sample. I remember reading about scientists doing protein analysis of a T. rex sample like 68 million years old, but I don't think there was any DNA, mitochondrial or otherwise.
20
posted on
11/16/2007 11:36:57 AM PST
by
mysterio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson