Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegal Ron Paul Currency Seized [more deatils, re: the ongoing "Liberty Dollar" follies]
CNN.com ^ | 11/16/2007 | Staff

Posted on 11/16/2007 10:13:07 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

EVANSVILLE, Indiana (AP) — Federal agents raided the headquarters of a group that produces illegal currency and puts it in circulation, seizing gold, silver and two tons of copper coins featuring Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul.

Agents also took records, computers and froze the bank accounts at the "Liberty Dollar" headquarters during the Thursday raid, Bernard von NotHaus, founder of the National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act & Internal Revenue Code, said in a posting on the group's Web site.

The organization, which is critical of the Federal Reserve, has repeatedly clashed with the federal government, which contends that the gold, silver and copper coins it produces are illegal.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bogusbucks; counterfeiting; libertydollar; libertydollars; norfed; nothaus; paulestinians; playmoney; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-296 next last
To: mogambo
It won't slow the collapse.

LOL! I guess your point was......no point at all.

It will slow you and the rest of the sheep down from trying to figure out creative ways around it.

Paying a premium to buy silver? Wow, creative!

141 posted on 11/16/2007 4:45:15 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

If you say so.


142 posted on 11/16/2007 4:45:55 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin; editor-surveyor
These coins were minted in alloy; but the definition of the eagle, dollar, and cent was dependent upon the respective gold, silver, or copper content.

That is correct. E.S. forgot to add those two metals in a reply. The point still is that money is supposed to backed by something, other than ink.

143 posted on 11/16/2007 4:47:34 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Paying a premium to buy silver? Wow, creative!

Just take a look at how the government drove up the price of Ron Pual silver dollars on Ebay. You could of got them for 28 bucks before the raid, now they are going for over 300 bucks after the raid.

144 posted on 11/16/2007 4:52:40 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
You could of got them for 28 bucks before the raid

Wow! $28 for less than $15 in silver. That is creative. I can see why the Feds were anxious to stop the stupid people from suffering 86% inflation with those purchases.

145 posted on 11/16/2007 5:07:44 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Wow! $28 for less than $15 in silver. That is creative. I can see why the Feds were anxious to stop the stupid people from suffering 86% inflation with those purchases.

I always figured that you and the Feds are superior to us.

146 posted on 11/16/2007 5:14:25 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
I always figured that you and the Feds are superior to us.

I don't know about the Feds, but I make it a point to not pay 180% or more of the value of a basic commodity. It has something to do with understanding math. Not everybody gets it.

147 posted on 11/16/2007 5:19:27 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I can see why the Feds were anxious to stop the stupid people from suffering 86% inflation with those purchases. T.P.

I don't know about the Feds, but I make it a point to not pay 180% or more of the value of a basic commodity. T.P.

I will leave your logic to yourself tonight.

148 posted on 11/16/2007 5:25:49 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
I will leave your logic to yourself tonight.

I'll speak slowly, because you're a goldbug. If you buy an ounce of silver (spot price a little below $15) for $28, you've over paid by about 86%.

Now if you pay 180% or more, of the value of a commodity, you're paying the value of the commodity (100%) plus the overpayment (80% or more).

Let me know if you need any more math or logic lessons. I'm always glad to help.

149 posted on 11/16/2007 5:32:18 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Now if you pay 180% or more, of the value of a commodity, you're paying the value of the commodity (100%) plus the overpayment (80% or more).

No T.P. That is what you were quoted as to willing to pay. Do I have to quote you again? Word for word?

150 posted on 11/16/2007 5:38:26 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
No T.P. That is what you were quoted as to willing to pay.

I was quoted as willing to pay $28 for an ounce of silver?

Do I have to quote you again? Word for word?

Yes.

151 posted on 11/16/2007 5:39:44 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Could you explain my quoted text from you on post 148 then?


152 posted on 11/16/2007 5:43:25 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
Do you not understand that paying an 80% premium is the same as paying 180%?

I could use examples with real numbers if that will help you.

153 posted on 11/16/2007 5:44:53 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Do you not understand that paying an 80% premium is the same as paying 180%?

Have at it.

"I can see why the Feds were anxious to stop the stupid people from suffering 86% inflation with those purchases. "T.P.

"I don't know about the Feds, but I make it a point to not pay 180% or more of the value of a basic commodity." T.P.

154 posted on 11/16/2007 5:52:01 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
Have at it.

Say oil is $100 a barrel. If you pay an 80% premium, you'd pay $180. That's the same as paying 180% of the value of the oil.

Is that easier for you to understand?

155 posted on 11/16/2007 5:56:16 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
When purchasing gasoline or food, I ask the cashier if ... they will accept “Federal Reserve Notes”. Most will not, except when I show them one of the bills.

Clerks are not always the sharpest knives in the drawer. About 20 years ago merchants in San Antonio suddenly began asking for street addresses, not Post Office Boxes, when paying by check. My home town did not have street addresses until years later, and there was no local mail delivery (just a free PO Box). Try and explain that to the clerk who has been instructed to not take a check without a street address.

Finally, disgusted by another clerk demanding a street address that did not exist, I sarcastically said "1600 Pennsylvania Avenue." The clerk didn't blink, just wrote it down on my check, and I realized I had solved the problem of not having a street address. After a while that address got boring, so I would mix it up with with "221B Baker Street," "10 Downing Street," or "1060 West Addison". No clerk ever caught on.

156 posted on 11/16/2007 6:07:48 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; DoughtyOne; Army Air Corps; Hornitos; MindBender26; Redmen4ever; ...
From the Liberty Dollar web-site (How to spend Liberty Dollars):


157 posted on 11/16/2007 6:13:10 PM PST by raygun ("It is wrong always, everywhere, anf for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Say oil is $100 a barrel. If you pay an 80% premium, you'd pay $180. That's the same as paying 180% of the value of the oil.

Sounds good, until you punch it up on a calculator. 100 plus 180 percent gives a figure of 280 dollars. Maybe you are a government Consumer Price Index person : )

158 posted on 11/16/2007 6:24:13 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: raygun

>>>>From the Liberty Dollar web-site (How to spend Liberty Dollars):

Translation:

How to give me $20.00, plus shipping and handling, for $10.00 worth of silver.


159 posted on 11/16/2007 6:24:35 PM PST by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
Sounds good, until you punch it up on a calculator. 100 plus 180 percent gives a figure of 280 dollars.

The only problem is I never said anything about adding 180%. Try again?

160 posted on 11/16/2007 6:27:55 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson