Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

BTW, just to be clear, not pushing HLA because it won’t pass is a rational compromise. Publicly opposing it because you think violating the rights of pre-born children is a “states rights” issue is not, it’s agreeing with the enemy.

So I don’t think Fred is compromising there, he is wrong.

However, I WILL compromise and vote FOR Fred, while faulting him for his WRONG position, if it comes to that.


77 posted on 11/16/2007 12:30:33 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
BTW, just to be clear, not pushing HLA because it won’t pass is a rational compromise. Publicly opposing it because you think violating the rights of pre-born children is a “states rights” issue is not, it’s agreeing with the enemy. So I don’t think Fred is compromising there, he is wrong.

The former is Thompson's position, not the latter. That's one of the factors that went into the NRLC endorsement, according to articles in the last few days.

80 posted on 11/16/2007 12:35:24 PM PST by kevkrom ("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

He isn’t “opposed” to it. He clarified that. He just knows it won’t pass.


91 posted on 11/16/2007 12:45:15 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson