Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
BTW, does anybody know which two votes the are saying Fred took that were NOT oppose to pro-choice? My guess is his votes for Title X. And apparently NRLC did not think those votes were anti-pro-life votes.

It could be McCain-Feingold. As I've pointed out to the folks who like to tout the NRLC "scorecards" of Thompson not being perfectly rated, McCain-Feingold was pretty much universally a "negative" scorecard mark for all advocacy groups, making the vote really neither inherently pro- or con- any particular position not directly related to the CFR issue.

72 posted on 11/16/2007 12:25:09 PM PST by kevkrom ("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

Do you think NARAL thought of M/F as a pro-choice bill?

I was talking about NARAL’s press release that said he voted against them 44 our of 46 times.

So I’m just trying to clarify, I know NRLC at one time thought that vote was anti-pro-life, but do you think NARAL counted it as pro-choice?


79 posted on 11/16/2007 12:34:28 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson