[jwalsh07]

Luskin may or may not be a hypocrite but the statement does in fact conflict with the SCOTUS doctrine of neutrality. It is not neutral for a state actor to make a declarative statement that evolution is not anti-religious when a large percentage of the American population believes just that.

I don't agree with that proposition but then again I don't agree with SCOTUS either since their "establishment clause" jurisprudence is bascially incoherent.

[steve-b]

It is not neutral for a state actor to make a declarative statement that evolution is not anti-religious when a large percentage of the American population believes just that.

Nonsense. By this inane "logic", having an army is not neutral because it gives preference to religions that accept that war is sometimes necessary over those that take an absolute pacifist stand.