Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
You can say “Well he wasn’t a REAL Deist” all you want, it doesn’t change the fact that he called himself a “thorough” Deist.

Non-responsive, Sir. You can misrepresent my objections all you want, it doesn’t change the fact that you are either unwilling or unable to define what Old Ben meant by “Deist,” and you seem equally unwilling to come to grips with the fact that without defining the meaning of “Deist” you then become free to change the meaning of the term at your discretion, as often as a mother changes diapers, while misrepresenting every switch as infallibly the very last word on the wisdom of Dr. Franklin himself. All done in the finest Liberal tradition of ignoring the crucial question and shifting the burden to a more comfortable subject.

250 posted on 11/28/2007 5:57:04 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]


To: YHAOS
What? I’m a liberal because when someone says “I am a Deist” I might actually think words have meaning and that Franklin considered himself a Deist?

I do not need to define the term in order to say that Franklin considered himself a Deist, said he was a Deist, and, according to himself, held a Deist philosophy. I am not free to Define what “Old Ben” meant by Deist, only that according to HIS definition, he was one.

Franklin said he was a thorough Deist. You may disagree with him about his own beliefs if you want, but you don't need me for that particular conversation, try a Ouija Board.

251 posted on 11/28/2007 6:28:11 PM PST by allmendream ("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD (Hunter 08))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson