Pissant, let me ask you a question. Why is it that you actually think Hunter has a popsicle's chance in a sauna of actually winning the GOP nomination? Mike Huckabee, who was actually below Hunter (I know, doesn't seem possible) has skyrocketed past him, as has Ron Paul. Thompson wasn't even running and had roughly 20 times the support that Hunter had at his "peak", and even now, he still thrashes DH. What earthly reason do you possibly have to think that Hunter is suddenly going to come flying out the gates and win it all?
One simple reason. Most people that learn about Hunter understand that he is superior to the others. In some cases by a very, very wide margin.
What earthly reason do you possibly have to think that Hunter is suddenly going to come flying out the gates and win it all?
***First, Hunter has more character. If Clinton taught us anything, it is that character is becoming more important than less important — certainly more important than name recognition. Second, you are not necessarily allowed to discuss all the reasons here on FR.
http://bb.intrade.com/intradeForum/posts/list/1805.page