What's ironic is that you don't even really think that. If you did, you'd go with what would actually save babies' lives now, instead of grandstanding for an HLA which is never going to pass muster for ratification anywise. I really hate to say it, but people who quixotically waste their time on pushing an HLA while excluding federalism from the equation are FAKE pro-lifers. They talk the talk, but haven't saved a single baby's life through their windmill tilting. Getting judges who actually understand the Constitution, throwing the ball to the States by overturning Roe v. Wade, and legislating and/or regulating abortion to death at the State level is what will (and already does) save lives.
Of course I do. Unlike Thompson I would support a human life amendment and criminalizing abortion while recognizing as a practical matter that neither can be obtained now.