The hostile insulting pressures to join a particular perspective, mind set, attitude etc.
did NOT
originate with me or with Las Vegas Dave.
You have been given multiple encouragements and exhortations to clean up your act on this thread and have refused to do so.
The overwhelming bulk of us are quite disgusted and extremely disinterested in discussing the time of day or anything else with you.
Hello AG:
I’ll let you decide if that’s the case. Quix refuses to back up his contentions and throws insults my way instead. No one else has claimed to have read Renato Vesco’s book, “Intercept UFO”. I posted just a sampling and Las Vegas Dave thanked me for the foo-fighter link.
What is the accepted approach to an inductive area of study? Is not Occham’s Razor and other inductive logic the prevailing accepted approach? And logic fallacies are to be avoided & corrected?
As part of the Inductive Triangle that I introduced on a different thread, we see the same level of invective here. The insults are outside of the triangle, the data — especially testable data — are inside. I offered the fact that I put forth falsifiable data and it has only been met with contempt.
I never said anything about Las Vegas Dave, it looks to me that Quix is just looking for some allies.
.
.
.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts