Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBrow

Worth it to me to save $30/month in electricity and have to change the light bulbs far less frequently irregardless.


105 posted on 11/11/2007 8:31:03 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: rb22982
And let someone else deal with the landfill later. I get it.

In an earlier post I suggested that if I switched entirely to Gorebulbs I’d need to pay more for heating, since the incandescents throw lots of heat. But, many people posting to the thread have found a net reduction in energy cost across a year, suggesting perhaps, just maybe, the inefficiency of the Edison bulb is not as bad as has been stated by members of Congress. Of course I don’t know everyone’s local climate.

In a cold season or cold climate the incandescent lamp’s inefficiency should not matter since in any system inefficiency shows up as heat, which you pay for to warm your room.

It’s about 56 here outside, but it’s 68 where I am now, in part because of the incandescent desk lamp.

110 posted on 11/11/2007 8:40:51 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: rb22982
Worth it to me to save $30/month in electricity and have to change the light bulbs far less frequently irregardless. <>Must have a house full of light bulbs if it's cut down that much
162 posted on 11/11/2007 10:26:34 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson