To: LSUfan
You're a pathetic liar. What you posted never said or implied that Ron Paul supported PLO terrorists. It is obviously a free speech stance, nothing more.
There are legitimate reasons to disagree with Ron Paul, just as any other candidate, but these vile, personal, and false attacks makes it look like you are afraid that he is going to win or make a difference and that you have no substantive grounds on which to attack him.
33 posted on
11/09/2007 1:37:12 PM PST by
Iwo Jima
("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
To: Iwo Jima
There are legitimate reasons to disagree with Ron Paul, just as any other candidate, but these vile, personal, and false attacks makes it look like you are afraid that he is going to win or make a difference and that you have no substantive grounds on which to attack him. Amen.
Ron Paul has the audacity of running on the platform of adhering to the Constitution-the rascal!
34 posted on
11/09/2007 1:44:04 PM PST by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
To: Iwo Jima
You are correct. But that won’t slow them down one iota. Ron is STILL wrong on the WoT, but trying to tie him to the PLO is like trying to tie Bush’s membership in the Skull and Bones to Anton Szandor Lavey.
37 posted on
11/09/2007 1:49:55 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: LSUfan
Oh, no. Now you've got their "Hello Kitty" panties all bunched up. ;)
39 posted on
11/09/2007 1:58:27 PM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
To: Iwo Jima; LSUfan
100 posted on
11/11/2007 5:34:26 AM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
To: Iwo Jima
“but these vile, personal, and false attacks makes it look like you are afraid that he is going to win.....”
I don’t know about LSUfan, but I think it is more likely that many people are afraid his half-a**ed, nutty uncle released from the basement precense distracts from real debate regarding legitimate presidential contenders rather than his not-a-chance-in-hell campaign. There....vile and personal enough for ya skippy?
109 posted on
11/11/2007 10:50:14 AM PST by
Bogtrotter52
(Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
To: Iwo Jima
Quite. I’m puzzled at the anti-Paul rhetoric, which is far more malicious and distorted than there would be if there was actually something to it. The marginalization seems more born of bare fear than rational disagreement.
(FWIW: I’m not a hardcore Paul supporter, but he seems more like what a Republican candidate should be than the others.)
116 posted on
11/12/2007 11:01:30 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson