You're the one calling them that.
I'm calling them members of a well regulated state Militia, and I'm saying their right to keep and bear arms is protected from federal infringement by the second amendment because they're necessary to the security of a free State.
Then bobby says, You're the one calling them that.
So... despite the prohibition being general, you still insist that its only "certain" people, acting as government agents, that have this Right. Despite there being tons of evidence that the "People" is all people within the jurisdiction of the United States as it is everywhere else in the Constituton. And despite the debates between the Founders about how best to protect an INDIVIDUAL Right.
IOW... you are just another anti-gun moron with an agenda.
Which means you're saying the state gets to decide who is a member, and the state gets to decide what arms they can have. That's "agents of the state", exercising a power of the state, and "rights" don't apply.