[robertpaulsen]

"So... you admit that in your view, civilians have no RKBA"

Never have. I have said that the second amendment does not protect the RKBA of civilians. That right is protected by their state constitution.

[Dead Corpse]

I have said that the second amendment does not protect the RKBA of civilians.

Despite the clear language of the Second Amendment stating that the Right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. You still insist that said "People" are just select government agents.

This runs contrary to everything the Constitutional Convention and the 1st Congress discussed and ratified. You are aware of this, and yet you persist.

[ctdonath2]

I have said that the second amendment does not protect the RKBA of civilians.

So, "civilians" != "people".

There really is no point in further discussion, guys.

[xsrdx]

I have said that the second amendment does not protect the RKBA of civilians.

So, the 2nd protects the right of the federal government not to disarm itself? Good thing they thought to put that in there, or the Army might not know it could issue weapons.

A ludicrous comment.