Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

On the other hand, the Marijuanna (sp?) Tax Stamp Act was allowed to stand, even though it was prohibition in the guise of a tax.

What changed between 1922 and the late 30’s?

FDR packed the court.


550 posted on 11/10/2007 7:00:51 AM PST by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies ]


To: patton
On the other hand, the Marijuanna (sp?) Tax Stamp Act was allowed to stand, even though it was prohibition in the guise of a tax.

But it was still and exercise of the power to tax. However even a granted power cannot be used to violate/infringe on a right protected by the Bill of Rights. If for no other reason (and there are others) than the BoR are amendments and the grant of the taxing power is in the main body, so that power is restricted/amended by the BoR. The "preamble" to the BoR makes that clear.

The conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added.

647 posted on 11/10/2007 4:48:03 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson